Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

E.D. Michigan

Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan

DecidedFebruary 23, 2021

Docket2:20-cv-12916

StatusUnknown

This text of Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Michigan primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, (E.D. Mich. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF 2:20-CV-12916 ANN ARBOR, PLLC,

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO ANSWER v. AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD STAY DISCOVERY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant. Plaintiff Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor, PLLC filed its complaint seeking to enjoin Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan from engaging in various anticompetitive activities. ECF No. 1, PageID.88-89. Plaintiff also seeks damages resulting from Defendant’s tortious conduct under Michigan law and violations of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act. Id. Defendant responded with a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Courts may set a time for serving an answer after a motion has been served under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4) (“Unless the court sets a different time, serving a motion under this rule alters these periods as follows…”); Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, 237 F.R.D. 613, 617 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (“[T]his Court recognizes that Rule 12(a)(4) also provides that a court may order an answer to be filed at a time other than after the motion to dismiss has

been denied or the court has postponed consideration of the motion.”) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)). Having the Defendant’s answer filed before the motion to dismiss is resolved will advance the litigation in a fair and efficient manner. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Defendant must file its answer to the complaint within 45 days of the date of this Order.

Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its motion to dismiss is therefore denied as moot. See ECF No. 14. Discovery will commence after the answer is filed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2021 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION

ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF 2:20-CV-12916 ANN ARBOR, PLLC,

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO ANSWER v. AND DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO BLUE CROSS BLUE SHIELD STAY DISCOVERY OF MICHIGAN, Defendant. Plaintiff Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor, PLLC filed its complaint seeking to enjoin Defendant Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan from engaging in various anticompetitive activities. ECF No. 1, PageID.88-89. Plaintiff also seeks damages resulting from Defendant’s tortious conduct under Michigan law and violations of the Sherman Act and Clayton Act. Id. Defendant responded with a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Courts may set a time for serving an answer after a motion has been served under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4) (“Unless the court sets a different time, serving a motion under this rule alters these periods as follows…”); Hill v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Michigan, 237 F.R.D. 613, 617 (E.D. Mich. 2006) (“[T]his Court recognizes that Rule 12(a)(4) also provides that a court may order an answer to be filed at a time other than after the motion to dismiss has

been denied or the court has postponed consideration of the motion.”) (citing Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(a)(4)). Having the Defendant’s answer filed before the motion to dismiss is resolved will advance the litigation in a fair and efficient manner. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS that the Defendant must file its answer to the complaint within 45 days of the date of this Order.

Defendant’s motion to stay discovery pending resolution of its motion to dismiss is therefore denied as moot. See ECF No. 14. Discovery will commence after the answer is filed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: February 23, 2021 s/Terrence G. Berg TERRENCE G. BERG UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Anesthesia Associates of Ann Arbor PLLC v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anesthesia-associates-of-ann-arbor-pllc-v-blue-cross-blue-shield-of-mied-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack