Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc.

657 So. 2d 900, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 26, 1995 WL 1527

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 4, 1995·No. No. 94-248·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have on review a final order of dismissal against 68 of 69 plaintiffs on the ground of misjoinder of parties.

While the trial court has wide discretion to control the docket in order to ensure economic and judicial efficiency (for instance, grouping or severing claims for trial or discovery purposes), we find that dismissal was not appropriate. See rule 1.250(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; Alanco v. Bystrom, 544 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1164 (Fla.1989).

The order of dismissal is, therefore, reversed.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have on review a final order of dismissal against 68 of 69 plaintiffs on the ground of misjoinder of parties.

While the trial court has wide discretion to control the docket in order to ensure economic and judicial efficiency (for instance, grouping or severing claims for trial or discovery purposes), we find that dismissal was not appropriate. See rule 1.250(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; Alanco v. Bystrom, 544 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1164 (Fla.1989).

The order of dismissal is, therefore, reversed.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc., 657 So. 2d 900, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 26, 1995 WL 1527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

657 So. 2d 900 (Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related