Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc.

657 So. 2d 900, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 26, 1995 WL 1527
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 4, 1995
DocketNo. 94-248
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 657 So. 2d 900 (Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Anemone v. Concorde Careers Florida Inc., 657 So. 2d 900, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 26, 1995 WL 1527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have on review a final order of dismissal against 68 of 69 plaintiffs on the ground of misjoinder of parties.

While the trial court has wide discretion to control the docket in order to ensure economic and judicial efficiency (for instance, grouping or severing claims for trial or discovery purposes), we find that dismissal was not appropriate. See rule 1.250(a), Florida Rules of Civil Procedure; Alanco v. Bystrom, 544 So.2d 217 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), rev. denied, 553 So.2d 1164 (Fla.1989).

The order of dismissal is, therefore, reversed.

WOLF, WEBSTER and MICKLE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gemmill v. State
657 So. 2d 900 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
657 So. 2d 900, 1995 Fla. App. LEXIS 26, 1995 WL 1527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/anemone-v-concorde-careers-florida-inc-fladistctapp-1995.