ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. Hobbs
16 A.3d 703, 300 Conn. 928
This text of 16 A.3d 703 (ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. Hobbs, 16 A.3d 703, 300 Conn. 928 (Colo. 2011).
Opinion
ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC.
v.
Thomas HOBBS et al.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Derek V. Oatis, in support of the petition.
Donald W. McGill, Waterbury, in opposition.
*704 The petition by the defendants Michael Janiszewski and Zife Krois for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 125 Conn.App. 708, 9 A.3d 433 (2010), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
ANDY'S OIL SERVICE, INC. v. Hobbs
9 A.3d 433 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 A.3d 703, 300 Conn. 928, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andys-oil-service-inc-v-hobbs-conn-2011.