Andy v. State

87 Ala. 23
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 15, 1888·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

CLOPTON, J.

On the day set for the trial, but before a jury was organized, appellant, who was jointly indicted with others, moved for a severance as to himself. Section 4451 of Code of 1886 declares: “When two or more defendants are jointly indicted; they may be tried either jointly or separately, as either may elect.” Under the statute, as it stood prior to this enactment, and also in the absence of statutory regulations, it was held, that the allowance of a separate trial was discretionary with the court. — Code, 1876, § 4892; Hawkins v. State, 9 Ala. 137; Wade v. State, 40 Ala. 74. The purpose and operation of section 4451 are to abrogate the former rule, and to entitle either defendant to a separate trial as matter of right. Under the present statute, when two or more persons are jointly indicted, and [24] either so elects in proper time, the allowance of a separate trial is imperative.

Reversed and remanded.

Note.' — See Rule of Practice, since adopted, regulating severances. — 86 Ala. vm.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andy v. State, 87 Ala. 23 (Ala. 1888).

87 Ala. 23 (Andy v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holsemback v. State
443 So. 2d 1371 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 1983)
Palmer v. State
73 So. 139 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1916)
Davis v. People
22 Colo. 1 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1895)