Andujar v. Parisi

39 A.D.3d 630, 831 N.Y.S.2d 918

This text of 39 A.D.3d 630 (Andujar v. Parisi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andujar v. Parisi, 39 A.D.3d 630, 831 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Cohen-Gallet, R.), dated June 20, 2005, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for physical custody of the child.

[631]*631Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court correctly determined, upon consideration of the applicable factors, that a change in physical custody from the mother to the father was in the best interests of the child (see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 95 [1982]; Matter of Fialkowski v Gilroy, 200 AD2d 668, 669 [1994]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Covello and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Friederwitzer v. Friederwitzer
432 N.E.2d 765 (New York Court of Appeals, 1982)
Fialkowski v. Gilroy
200 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
39 A.D.3d 630, 831 N.Y.S.2d 918, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andujar-v-parisi-nyappdiv-2007.