Andujar v. Parisi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Andujar v. Parisi

39 A.D.3d 630, 831 N.Y.S.2d 918

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 10, 2007·Published

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Cohen-Gallet, R.), dated June 20, 2005, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for physical custody of the child.

[631] Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court correctly determined, upon consideration of the applicable factors, that a change in physical custody from the mother to the father was in the best interests of the child (see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 95 [1982]; Matter of Fialkowski v Gilroy, 200 AD2d 668, 669 [1994]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Covello and Carni, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Richmond County (Cohen-Gallet, R.), dated June 20, 2005, which, after a hearing, granted the father’s petition for physical custody of the child.

[631] Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

The Family Court correctly determined, upon consideration of the applicable factors, that a change in physical custody from the mother to the father was in the best interests of the child (see Friederwitzer v Friederwitzer, 55 NY2d 89, 95 [1982]; Matter of Fialkowski v Gilroy, 200 AD2d 668, 669 [1994]). Crane, J.P., Krausman, Covello and Carni, JJ., concur.

Andujar v. Parisi, 39 A.D.3d 630, 831 N.Y.S.2d 918 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

39 A.D.3d 630 (Andujar v. Parisi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related