Andrus v. New York City Transit Authority

276 A.D.2d 571, 714 N.Y.S.2d 881, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10364

This text of 276 A.D.2d 571 (Andrus v. New York City Transit Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrus v. New York City Transit Authority, 276 A.D.2d 571, 714 N.Y.S.2d 881, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10364 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injures, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated December 10, 1999, as denied his motion for partial summary judgment on his cause of action to recover damages pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

[572]*572The Supreme Court properly denied the plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment (see, Jacome v State of New York, 266 AD2d 345; Smith v Hovnanian Co., 218 AD2d 68). Bracken, J. P., Santucci, Altman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Hovnanian Co., Inc.
218 A.D.2d 68 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
Jacome v. State
266 A.D.2d 345 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
276 A.D.2d 571, 714 N.Y.S.2d 881, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10364, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrus-v-new-york-city-transit-authority-nyappdiv-2000.