Andrus v. Board of Police
This text of 41 La. Ann. 697 (Andrus v. Board of Police) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[699]*699Tlie opiniop of tlie Court was delivered by
There is no merit in the motion to dismiss.
The judgment was signed on May 18th, and, on the same day, in presence of counsel for plaintiff, in open court, defendant made his motion and obtained his order of appeal.
No citation of appeal was necessary. The Articles 1128 to 1138, C. P., manifestly refer to appeals from justices’ courts to district courts, and not to appeals directly to this court.
Appeals were taken simultaneously in this case aiid in another numbered 1,336 of our docket, identical in character. By a clerical error the certificates to the two transcripts were exchanged. Under certiorari, this manifest error has been corrected and the matter is too trivial to require further notice.
A member of the Board of Police of an incorporated town is a competent surety for the board in its corporate capacity on a bond of appeal.
Tlie authorities quoted from 2 N. S. 572, and 2 Rob. 449, have not the slightest application.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 La. Ann. 697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrus-v-board-of-police-la-1889.