Andrus v. Bealls

9 Cow. 693
New York Supreme Court·Decided August 15, 1824·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Sutherland, J.

at first, thought the second plea, viz. of notice to revoke, &e. a good one, and that the facts stated ope rated to release the defendants, Who were sureties; though *he held the third plea bad, as the sheriff was not bound to defend on the attachment,

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrus v. Bealls, 9 Cow. 693 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1824).

9 Cow. 693 (Andrus v. Bealls) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dunn v. Bailey
255 P. 930 (Washington Supreme Court, 1927)
Reilly v. . Dodge
29 N.E. 1011 (New York Court of Appeals, 1892)