Andrus v. Bealls
This text of 9 Cow. 693 (Andrus v. Bealls) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
at first, thought the second plea, viz. of notice to revoke, &e. a good one, and that the facts stated ope rated to release the defendants, Who were sureties; though *he held the third plea bad, as the sheriff was not bound to defend on the attachment,
[739]*739Savage, Chief J. and Woodworth, J. were, however, against both pleas; and
Judgment was for the plaintiff.
END OP THE CASES IN THE SUPREME CGCBt.
Tide Stone v. Hooker, ante 154.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
9 Cow. 693, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrus-v-bealls-nysupct-1824.