Andrus v. Andrus
1 Root 72
Opinion
The plaintiff demurrs — And judgment that the plea is insufficient —■ the receipts show, that said Zebulon had paid his equitable part for those years as it respected him, but can be no bar .to her as to what is still behind and unpaid.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrus v. Andrus, 1 Root 72 (Colo. Ct. App. 1775).
1 Root 72 (Andrus v. Andrus) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.