Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State
This text of Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State (Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-13-00289-CR
ANDRUIA GIARDIA BUCHANAN APPELLANT
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE
----------
FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1
After a grand jury returned its indictment that charged Andruia Giardia
Buchanan with possession of four grams or more but less than 200 grams of
cocaine, Buchanan negotiated a plea-bargain agreement with the State. The trial
court admonished Buchanan on the consequences of a guilty plea, accepted the
plea and, following the terms of the plea-bargain agreement, sentenced
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Buchanan to ten years’ confinement. The trial court certified that this is a plea-
bargain case, that Buchanan has no right of appeal, and that Buchanan had also
waived the right of appeal.2
Despite the trial court’s certification, however, Buchanan filed a notice of
appeal. We sent notice to Buchanan expressing our concern that we lacked
jurisdiction over this appeal and advising that it would be dismissed unless
Buchanan or any party timely sent us a reply stating the grounds for continuing
the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Buchanan timely responded, but the
response does not provide any grounds for continuing this appeal. Accordingly,
we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); see also Blanco v.
State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d
239, 243 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); Stanley v. State, 111 S.W.3d
773, 775 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).
PER CURIAM
PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.
DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)
DELIVERED: October 24, 2013
2 A valid waiver of appeal prevents a defendant from appealing without the trial court’s consent. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andruia-giardia-buchanan-v-state-texapp-2013.