Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedOctober 24, 2013
Docket02-13-00289-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State (Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-13-00289-CR

ANDRUIA GIARDIA BUCHANAN APPELLANT

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS STATE

----------

FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 1 OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1

After a grand jury returned its indictment that charged Andruia Giardia

Buchanan with possession of four grams or more but less than 200 grams of

cocaine, Buchanan negotiated a plea-bargain agreement with the State. The trial

court admonished Buchanan on the consequences of a guilty plea, accepted the

plea and, following the terms of the plea-bargain agreement, sentenced

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. Buchanan to ten years’ confinement. The trial court certified that this is a plea-

bargain case, that Buchanan has no right of appeal, and that Buchanan had also

waived the right of appeal.2

Despite the trial court’s certification, however, Buchanan filed a notice of

appeal. We sent notice to Buchanan expressing our concern that we lacked

jurisdiction over this appeal and advising that it would be dismissed unless

Buchanan or any party timely sent us a reply stating the grounds for continuing

the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3. Buchanan timely responded, but the

response does not provide any grounds for continuing this appeal. Accordingly,

we dismiss the appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(d), 43.2(f); see also Blanco v.

State, 18 S.W.3d 218, 220 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d

239, 243 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2005, no pet.); Stanley v. State, 111 S.W.3d

773, 775 (Tex. App.––Fort Worth 2003, no pet.).

PER CURIAM

PANEL: GARDNER, WALKER, and MCCOY, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED: October 24, 2013

2 A valid waiver of appeal prevents a defendant from appealing without the trial court’s consent. Monreal v. State, 99 S.W.3d 615, 622 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco v. State
18 S.W.3d 218 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)
Monreal v. State
99 S.W.3d 615 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Jackson v. State
168 S.W.3d 239 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Richard D. Stanley v. State
111 S.W.3d 773 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Andruia Giardia Buchanan v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andruia-giardia-buchanan-v-state-texapp-2013.