Androscoggin Water Power Co. v. Metcalf

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Androscoggin Water Power Co. v. Metcalf

65 Me. 40, 1876 Me. LEXIS 8

CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine

DecidedMarch 15, 1876

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 Me. 40 (Androscoggin Water Power Co. v. Metcalf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Androscoggin Water Power Co. v. Metcalf, 65 Me. 40, 1876 Me. LEXIS 8 (Me. 1876).

Pincite

Opinion

Virgin, J.

The doctrine that the waiving of a tort and suing in assumpsit are limited to cases where the defendant has converted the property into money or its equivalent, is too firmly established in this state to be “pressed one step further.” Noyes v. Loring, 55 Maine, 408. Paine v. McGlinchy, 56 Maine, 50, and cases there cited. Default to be stricken of.

Case to stand for trial.

Appleton, O. J., Walton, Barrows, Daneorth and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Virgin, J.

The doctrine that the waiving of a tort and suing in assumpsit are limited to cases where the defendant has converted the property into money or its equivalent, is too firmly established in this state to be “pressed one step further.” Noyes v. Loring, 55 Maine, 408. Paine v. McGlinchy, 56 Maine, 50, and cases there cited. Default to be stricken of.

Case to stand for trial.

Appleton, O. J., Walton, Barrows, Daneorth and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 Me. 40, 1876 Me. LEXIS 8, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/androscoggin-water-power-co-v-metcalf-me-1876.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack