Andrinki Hovsepian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Ninth Circuit

Andrinki Hovsepian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

125 F.3d 858, 1997 WL 599850

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedSeptember 24, 1997

Docket95-70433

StatusUnpublished

This text of 125 F.3d 858 (Andrinki Hovsepian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrinki Hovsepian v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 125 F.3d 858, 1997 WL 599850 (9th Cir. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

125 F.3d 858

NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
Andrinki HOVSEPIAN, Petitioner,
v.
IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent.

No. 95-70433.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 22, 1997.**
Sept. 24, 1997.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals.

Before: HALL, BRUNETTI and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM*

In accordance with Duldulao v. INS, 90 F.3d 396 (9th Cir.1996), we dismiss this petition for lack of jurisdiction.

DISMISSED.

**

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4

*

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI