Andria Stanley v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 30, 2015
NO. 03-13-00390-CR
Andria Stanley, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM THE 390TH DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE ROSE, JUSTICES GOODWIN AND BOURLAND AFFIRMED; MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE BOURLAND
This is an appeal from the judgments of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed
the record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no error in the trial court’s
judgments requiring reversal. Accordingly, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of
conviction for Count I. However, there was error in the judgment of conviction for Count III
that requires correction. Therefore, the Court modifies the trial court’s judgment of conviction
for Count III to reflect that the “Statute for Offense” is “22.02(a)(2) Penal Code.” The judgment,
as modified, is affirmed. Because appellant is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication
of costs is made.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andria Stanley v. State (Andria Stanley v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.