Andrews v. Vanduzer

11 Johns. 38
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 15, 1814·Published·Cited by 13 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decision of the court below was correct. The cases in Cro. Jac. 677. 1 Ld. Raym. 727. Bull. N. P. 9. show that the defendant who would justify a charge of felony, must justify as to the specific charge laid, and cannot set up a charge of the same thing, but distinct as to the subject matter. It is a settled rule that a defendant cannot give in evidence, under the general issue in an action of slander, matter which might be pleaded in bar, nor can he give in evidence any other crime than the one charged. The judgment below must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Vanduzer, 11 Johns. 38 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1814).

11 Johns. 38 (Andrews v. Vanduzer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace v. Homestead Co.
90 N.W. 835 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1902)
Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Schenck
98 F. 925 (Second Circuit, 1900)
McKane v. Brooklyn Citizen
6 N.Y.S. 171 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)
Dufresne v. Weise
46 Wis. 290 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1879)
Swift v. Dickerman
31 Conn. 285 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1863)
Hopkins v. Smith
3 Barb. 599 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Palmer v. Haight
2 Barb. 210 (New York Supreme Court, 1848)
Torrey v. Field
10 Vt. 353 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1838)
Long v. Brougher
5 Watts 439 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1836)
Goodbread v. . Ledbetter
18 N.C. 12 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1834)
Smith v. Buckecker
4 Rawle 295 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1833)
Woodbeck v. Keller
6 Cow. 118 (New York Supreme Court, 1826)
Matthews v. Davis
7 Ky. 173 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1815)