Andrews v. United States

Court of Claims

Andrews v. United States

49 Ct. Cl. 391, 1914 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 186, 1914 WL 1425

CourtUnited States Court of Claims

DecidedMarch 16, 1914

DocketNo. 30785

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 Ct. Cl. 391 (Andrews v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Claims primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. United States, 49 Ct. Cl. 391, 1914 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 186, 1914 WL 1425 (cc 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam :

This case was reported in 47 C. Cls., 51, wherein the petition was dismissed, and the claimant now makes a motion for a new trial upon the ground of error of law.

The facts are undisputed, and as they briefly appear in the foregoing findings it is unnecessary to restate them here. It is only necessary to say that upon further and more mature consideration of the legal question involved we have come to the conclusion that an error was committed by the court upon the former trial, and that judgment should have been rendered in favor of the claimant. Glavey v. United States, 187 U. S., 595; Whiting v. United States, 35 C. Cls., 291, 301; Dyer v. United States, 20 C. Cls., 166.

The claimant’s motion for a new trial will be allowed and judgment now entered in his favor in the sum of $325, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam :

This case was reported in 47 C. Cls., 51, wherein the petition was dismissed, and the claimant now makes a motion for a new trial upon the ground of error of law.

The facts are undisputed, and as they briefly appear in the foregoing findings it is unnecessary to restate them here. It is only necessary to say that upon further and more mature consideration of the legal question involved we have come to the conclusion that an error was committed by the court upon the former trial, and that judgment should have been rendered in favor of the claimant. Glavey v. United States, 187 U. S., 595; Whiting v. United States, 35 C. Cls., 291, 301; Dyer v. United States, 20 C. Cls., 166.

The claimant’s motion for a new trial will be allowed and judgment now entered in his favor in the sum of $325, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Ct. Cl. 391, 1914 U.S. Ct. Cl. LEXIS 186, 1914 WL 1425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-united-states-cc-1914.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack