Andrews v. Townshend

16 Jones & S. 162
The Superior Court of New York City·Decided April 3, 1882·Published

Opinion

By the Court.—Sedgwick, Ch. J.

The cases cited for appellant show, that the writings to be inspected must relate to the maintaining the position [163] taken by the applicant, not that of the opposite party. As there was no application on the ground that the papers might be forged, the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to be taxed.

Freedman, J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Townshend, 16 Jones & S. 162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).

16 Jones & S. 162 (Andrews v. Townshend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.