Andrews v. Townshend
16 Jones & S. 162
This text of 16 Jones & S. 162 (Andrews v. Townshend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Andrews v. Townshend, 16 Jones & S. 162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
Opinion
The cases cited for appellant show, that the writings to be inspected must relate to the maintaining the position [163]*163taken by the applicant, not that of the opposite party. As there was no application on the ground that the papers might be forged, the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to be taxed.
Freedman, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
16 Jones & S. 162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-townshend-nysuperctnyc-1882.