Andrews v. Townshend
16 Jones & S. 162
Opinion
The cases cited for appellant show, that the writings to be inspected must relate to the maintaining the position [163] taken by the applicant, not that of the opposite party. As there was no application on the ground that the papers might be forged, the order should be reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to be taxed.
Freedman, J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrews v. Townshend, 16 Jones & S. 162 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1882).
16 Jones & S. 162 (Andrews v. Townshend) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.