Andrews v. Thomas
19 S.C.L. 278
This text of 19 S.C.L. 278 (Andrews v. Thomas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Andrews v. Thomas, 19 S.C.L. 278 (S.C. Ct. App. 1833).
Opinion
Under the Acts of 1787, P. L. 435, and 1799, 2 Faust, 323, authorizing the examination of witnesses who reside out of the State, notice of the application for that purpose, must, if required, be served on the party himself; service on the attorney, is not sufficient—Bartoline v. Heartle, 2 Bailey, 196.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
19 S.C.L. 278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-thomas-scctapp-1833.