Andrews v. Suter

D.C. Circuit

Andrews v. Suter

272 F. App'x 1

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedMarch 17, 2008

DocketNo. 05-5342

StatusPublished

This text of 272 F. App'x 1 (Andrews v. Suter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. Suter, 272 F. App'x 1 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

[2]*2 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, supplement, and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 10 and July 12, 2005 be affirmed. Appellant’s action is frivolous, as the defendant clerks “are immune from damage suits for performance of tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process.” Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C.Cir.1993) (per curiam).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[2]*2 JUDGMENT

PER CURIAM.

This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief, supplement, and appendix filed by appellant. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is

ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 10 and July 12, 2005 be affirmed. Appellant’s action is frivolous, as the defendant clerks “are immune from damage suits for performance of tasks that are an integral part of the judicial process.” Sindram v. Suda, 986 F.2d 1459, 1460 (D.C.Cir.1993) (per curiam).

Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

272 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-suter-cadc-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack