Andrews v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Andrews v. State

1919 OK CR 241, 182 P. 250, 16 Okla. Crim. 697, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 195

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided August 12, 1919·No. No. A-3251.·Published

Opinion

PER CURXAM.

Brooks' Andrews was convicted in the district court of Jefferson county of a violation of the prohibitory liquor laws, second offense, and his punishment fixed as above stated.

This appeal has been pending in this court since the 29th day of January, 1918, the cause having been submitted June 3, 1919, at which time no appearance was made by any counsel representing plaintiff in error, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. Rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x) provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

This appeal has evidently been abandoned. An examination of the pleadings, instructions and judgment and sentence discloses no prejudicial error, and in accordance with Rule 9, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURXAM.

Brooks' Andrews was convicted in the district court of Jefferson county of a violation of the prohibitory liquor laws, second offense, and his punishment fixed as above stated.

This appeal has been pending in this court since the 29th day of January, 1918, the cause having been submitted June 3, 1919, at which time no appearance was made by any counsel representing plaintiff in error, nor has any brief been filed in his behalf. Rule 9 of this court (12 Okla. Cr. viii, 165 Pac. x) provides:

“When no counsel appears, and no briefs are filed, the court will examine the pleadings, the instructions of the court and the exceptions taken thereto, and the judgment and sentence, and if no prejudicial error appears, will affirm the judgment.”

This appeal has evidently been abandoned. An examination of the pleadings, instructions and judgment and sentence discloses no prejudicial error, and in accordance with Rule 9, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Andrews v. State, 1919 OK CR 241, 182 P. 250, 16 Okla. Crim. 697, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 195 (Okla. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

1919 OK CR 241 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.