Andrews v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Andrews v. State

465 S.W.3d 543, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 767, 2015 WL 4548903

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided July 28, 2015·No. WD 77551·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Roy Andrews appeals from the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Roy Andrews appeals from the Circuit Court of Jackson County’s denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. After a thorough review of the record, we conclude that the judgment is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous and that no error of law appears. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a formal, published opinion; however, a memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision has been provided to the parties.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Andrews v. State, 465 S.W.3d 543, 2015 Mo. App. LEXIS 767, 2015 WL 4548903 (Mo. Ct. App. 2015).

Pincite

465 S.W.3d 543 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.