Andrews v. State

708 So. 2d 654, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3440, 1998 WL 150484
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 3, 1998
DocketNo. 95-05090
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 708 So. 2d 654 (Andrews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. State, 708 So. 2d 654, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3440, 1998 WL 150484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

BLUE, Judge.

David B. Andrews appeals his conviction for scheme to defraud and the guidelines departure sentence imposed. As in the case of James A. Kipping, Andrews’ co-defendant, we affirm the conviction, reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Kipping v. State, 702 So.2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We resolve Andrews’ only issue not presented in Kipping by holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion for continuance. See Parker v. State, 641 So.2d 369, 373-74 (Fla.1994); Corbett v. State, 602 So.2d 1240, 1242 (Fla.1992).

Accordingly, we affirm the conviction, reverse the departure sentence and remand for resentencing within the sentencing guidelines.

ALTENBERND, A.C.J., and YOUNG, ROBERT A, Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Greene v. State
714 So. 2d 554 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
708 So. 2d 654, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 3440, 1998 WL 150484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-state-fladistctapp-1998.