Andrews v. State
Opinion
David B. Andrews appeals his conviction for scheme to defraud and the guidelines departure sentence imposed. As in the case of James A. Kipping, Andrews’ co-defendant, we affirm the conviction, reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing within the guidelines. See Kipping v. State, 702 So.2d 578 (Fla. 2d DCA 1997). We resolve Andrews’ only issue not presented in Kipping by holding the trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying his motion for continuance. See Parker v. State, 641 So.2d 369, 373-74 (Fla.1994); Corbett v. State, 602 So.2d 1240, 1242 (Fla.1992).
Accordingly, we affirm the conviction, reverse the departure sentence and remand for resentencing within the sentencing guidelines.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
708 So. 2d 654 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.