Andrews v. State

319 So. 2d 613
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrews v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 357 So. 2d 489
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 14, 1975·No. No. 75-114·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from an order of the trial court denying appellant’s motion, filed under Rule 3.850, RCrP, 34 F.S.A. for relief from a judgment of conviction. The defendant, Andrews, appeals contending his court appointed counsel failed to subpoena a witness for the purpose of testifying at his trial, which evidence, once obtained, would strongly support defendant’s claim of self-defense.

The record, at the Rule 3.850 hearing, reflects that Andrews’ counsel did subpoena the witness in question and exercised the judgment and skill required of him under the facts of this case and applicable law. Caplinger v. State, Fla.App.1973, 271 So.2d 780; Fuller v. Wainwright, Fla.1970, 238 So.2d 65 and Weeks v. State, Fla.App.1971, 253 So.2d 459.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. State, 319 So. 2d 613 (Fla. Ct. App. 1975).

319 So. 2d 613 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fuller v. Wainwright
238 So. 2d 65 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1970)
Caplinger v. State
271 So. 2d 780 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Weeks v. State
253 So. 2d 459 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1971)