Andrews v. State
This text of 390 So. 2d 61 (Andrews v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari must be and is hereby discharged.
No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(d).
It is so ordered.
Opinion Below: 372 So.2d 143.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
390 So. 2d 61, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4422, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-state-fla-1980.