Andrews v. State
390 So. 2d 61, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4422
Opinion
The petition for writ of certiorari reflected probable jurisdiction in this Court. We issued the writ and have heard argument of the parties. After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the writ of certiorari must be and is hereby discharged.
No motion for rehearing will be entertained by this Court. See Fla.R.App.P. 9.330(d).
It is so ordered.
Opinion Below: 372 So.2d 143.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrews v. State, 390 So. 2d 61, 1980 Fla. LEXIS 4422 (Fla. 1980).
390 So. 2d 61 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Alsina v. State
564 So. 2d 1263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Sampson v. State
400 So. 2d 170 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)
Damon v. State
397 So. 2d 1224 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)