Andrews v. State

126 So. 751, 99 Fla. 1350
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 12, 1930·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinions

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice TERRELL, Mr. Justice STRUM and Mr. Justice BROWN are of the opinion that the judgment of the Criminal Court of Record should be reversed, while Mr. Justice WHITFIELD, Mr. Justice ELLIS and Mr. Justice BUFORD are of the opinion that the said judgment should be affirmed. When it appears that the members of the court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether a judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the court, the judgment should be affirmed. Therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged that the judgment of the Criminal Court of *Page 1352 Record in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed on the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51.

TERRELL, C. J., AND WHITFIELD, ELLIS, STRUM, BROWN AND BUFORD, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. State, 126 So. 751, 99 Fla. 1350 (Fla. 1930).

126 So. 751 (Andrews v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Darling v. State
808 So. 2d 145 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2002)
Dean v. State
478 So. 2d 38 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1985)
Menard v. State
427 So. 2d 399 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1983)
United States v. Leon Franklin Yaughn
493 F.2d 441 (Fifth Circuit, 1974)
Sherwood v. State
271 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1972)
Collins Fruit Company v. Giglio
184 So. 2d 447 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1966)
State v. Pettibone
164 So. 2d 801 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1964)
Pettibone v. State
160 So. 2d 126 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)
Smith v. State
19 So. 2d 698 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1944)