Andrews v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

District Court, W.D. Arkansas·Decided June 3, 2025·No. 2:25-cv-02031·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION

KATHY JO ANDREWS PLAINTIFF

v. Case No. 2:25-cv-2031

FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner Social Security Administration DEFENDANT

JUDGMENT Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation filed May 13, 2025, by the Honorable Barry A. Bryant, United States Magistrate Judge for the Western District of Arkansas. ECF No. 12. Fourteen (14) days have passed without objections being filed by the parties. The Court has reviewed this case, and being well and sufficiently advised, finds that the Report and Recommendation is proper and should be adopted in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby adopts the Report and Recommendation and finds that Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Reversal and Remand (ECF No. 10) should be and hereby is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner is REVERSED, and this case is REMANDED to the Commissioner for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) (2006). If Plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney’s fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes “not appealable” i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty(60)-day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S. Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of June, 2025. /s/ Susan O. Hickey Susan O. Hickey Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, (W.D. Ark. 2025).

Andrews v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Andrews v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)