Andrews v. Silva

157 N.E.2d 399, 338 Mass. 799
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided April 1, 1959·Published

Opinion

Exceptions overruled. On December 3, 1955, the plaintiff (a minor) was injured while riding as a guest in an automobile owned and operated by the defendant. He brings this action of tort to recover for the injuries sustained. An auditor, to whom the case was referred under the usual rule, found that the accident which resulted in the plaintiff’s injuries was caused by the gross negligence of the defendant in the operation of his automobile. The case was tried to a jury on the auditor’s report and other evidence and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The sole question for decision is whether the judge erred in denying the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict. Neither the subsidiary findings of the auditor nor the evidence need be recited. It is enough to say that both amply warranted a finding of gross negligence on the part of the defendant. The defendant’s motion was rightly denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Silva, 157 N.E.2d 399, 338 Mass. 799 (Mass. 1959).

157 N.E.2d 399 (Andrews v. Silva) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.