Andrews v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims·Decided May 17, 2018·No. 16-1666·Unpublished

Opinion

In the United States Court of Federal Claims OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS No. 16-1666V Filed: March 16, 2018 UNPUBLISHED

DAWN ANDREWS, Special Processing Unit (SPU); Joint Petitioner, Stipulation on Damages; Influenza v. (Flu) Vaccine; Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND (SIRVA) HUMAN SERVICES,

Respondent.

John Robert Howie, Howie Law, PC, Dallas, TX, for petitioner. Sarah Christina Duncan, U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, DC, for respondent.

DECISION ON JOINT STIPULATION1

Dorsey, Chief Special Master:

On December 20, 2016, petitioner filed a petition for compensation under the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §300aa-10, et seq.,2 (the “Vaccine Act”). Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (“SIRVA”) as a result of receiving the influenza (“flu”) vaccine on November 24, 2015. Petition at 1; Stipulation, filed March 15, 2018, at ¶¶ 1-2. Petitioner further alleges that she experienced the residual effects of this injury for more than six months. Petition at 5; Stipulation at ¶ 4. “Respondent denies that the influenza vaccine caused petitioner to suffer a SIRVA or any other injury.” Stipulation at ¶ 6.

Nevertheless, on March 15, 2018, the parties filed the attached joint stipulation, stating that a decision should be entered awarding compensation. The undersigned finds the stipulation reasonable and adopts it as the decision of the Court in awarding damages, on the terms set forth therein.

1 Because this unpublished decision contains a reasoned explanation for the action in this case, the undersigned intends to post it on the United States Court of Federal Claims' website, in accordance with the E-Government Act of 2002. 44 U.S.C. § 3501 note (2012) (Federal Management and Promotion of Electronic Government Services). In accordance with Vaccine Rule 18(b), petitioner has 14 days to identify and move to redact medical or other information, the disclosure of which would constitute an unwarranted invasion of privacy. If, upon review, the undersigned agrees that the identified material fits within this definition, the undersigned will redact such material from public access.

2National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986, Pub. L. No. 99-660, 100 Stat. 3755. Hereinafter, for ease of citation, all “§” references to the Vaccine Act will be to the pertinent subparagraph of 42 U.S.C. § 300aa (2012). Pursuant to the terms stated in the attached Stipulation, the undersigned awards the following compensation:

A lump sum of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to petitioner. Stipulation at ¶ 8. This amount represents compensation for all items of damages that would be available under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a). Id.

The undersigned approves the requested amount for petitioner’s compensation. In the absence of a motion for review filed pursuant to RCFC Appendix B, the clerk of the court is directed to enter judgment in accordance with this decision.3

IT IS SO ORDERED.

s/Nora Beth Dorsey Nora Beth Dorsey Chief Special Master

3 Pursuant to Vaccine Rule 11(a), entry of judgment can be expedited by the parties’ joint filing of notice renouncing the right to seek review.

2 IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS OFFICE OF SPECIAL MASTERS

) DAWN ANDREWS, ) ) Pe titioner, ) ) No. 16-1666V v. ) Chief Special Master Dorsey ) ECF SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN ) SERVICES, ) ) Respondent. )

STIPULATION

The parties hereby stipulate to the following matters:

1. Dawn Andrews , petitioner, filed a petition for vaccine compensation under the

National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program, 42 U.S.C. §§ 300aa-10 to -34 (the "Vaccine

Program"). The petition seeks compensation for iajuries allegedly related to petitioner's receipt

of an influenza vaccine, which vacci ne is contained in the Vaccine Injury Table (the "Table"),

42 C.F.R. § 100.3(a).

2. Petitioner received the influenza immunization on November 24, 201 S.

3. The vaccination was administered within the United States.

4. Petitioner alleges that she suffered a Shoulder Inju1·y Related to Vaccine

Administration ("SIRVA") as a result of rece iving the influenza vaccine, and experienced the

residual effects of this inj ury for more than six months.

5. Petitioner represents that there has been no prior award or settlement of a civil action

for damages on he1· behalf as a result of her condition.

6. Respondent denie s that the in fl uenza vaccine ca used petitioner to suffer a SIRVA or any other injury.

7. Maintai n ing their above*stated positions, the parties nevertheless now agree that the

issues between them shall be settled and that a decision should be entered awarding the

compensation described in paragraph 8 of this Stipulation.

8. As soon as practicable after an entry ofjudgment reflecting a decision consistent with

the t erms of this Stipulation, and after pet itioner has filed an el ection to receive compensation

pursuant to 42 U .S.C. § 300aa-2 l (a)(l ), the Secretary of Health and Human Services will is sue

the following vaccine compensation payment:

A lump sum of $70,000.00 in the form of a check payable to pet itioner . This amount represents compensation for all damages that would be ava ilable under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(a).

9. As soon as practicable after the entry ofj udgmer:it on entitlement in �his case, and after

petitioner has filed both a proper and timely election to receive compensat ion pul'Suant to

42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(J), and an application, the parties will su bmi t to further proceedings

before the special master to award reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in proceeding

upon this petition.

10. Petitio ner and her attorney represent that compensation to be provided pursuant to

this Stipulation is not for any i t�ms or services for which the Program is not primarily liable

under 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(g), to the extent that payment has been made or can reasonably be

expected to be made under any State compensation programs, insurance policies, Federal or

State health benefits programs (other than Title XIX of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C.

§ 1396 et seq,)), or by entities that provide health services on a pre-paid basis.

2 11. Payment made pursuant to paragraph 8 of t his Stipulation and any amounts awarded

pursuant to pamgraph 9 of this Stipulation w ill be made in accordance with 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-

15(i), s ubject to the availability of sufficient statutory funds.

12. The parties and their attorneys further agree and s tipul ate that, except for any award

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, (uscfc 2018).

Andrews v. Secretary of Health and Human Services (Andrews v. Secretary of Health and Human Services) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 300aa
42 U.S.C. § 300aa
§ 300aa-
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-
§ 300aa-10
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10
§ 300aa-15
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-15(a)
§ 300aa-2
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-2
§ 300aa-21
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-21(a)(J)
§ 300aa-l5
42 U.S.C. § 300aa-l5(a)
§ 300aaH15
42 U.S.C. § 300aaH15(g)
Purposes
44 U.S.C. § 3501
§ 300a
42 U.S.C. § 300a