Home/Fourth Circuit/Andrews v. Riggs National Bank (In re Andrews)

Andrews v. Riggs National Bank (In re Andrews)

90 F.3d 102, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18314, 1996 WL 416304
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Andrews v. Riggs National Bank (In re Andrews). Read the opinion of the Court — 80 F.3d 906 →
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 23, 1996·No. No. 93-2095·Published

Opinions

ORDER

WIDENER, Circuit Judge.

Upon a request for a poll of the court on the petition for rehearing en banc, voting for rehearing en banc were Judges Russell, Widener and Hall, and voting against rehearing en banc were Judges Wilkinson, Murnaghan, Wilkins, Niemeyer, Hamilton, Luttig, Williams, Michael and Motz. Judge Ervin did not participate in this decision.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing en banc shall be, and it hereby is, denied.

The panel considered the petition for rehearing and is of opinion it is without merit.

It is accordingly ADJUDGED and ORDERED that the petition for rehearing shall be, and it hereby is denied.

Judges WILKINS and ELLIS concur in this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. Riggs National Bank (In re Andrews), 90 F.3d 102, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 18314, 1996 WL 416304 (4th Cir. 1996).

90 F.3d 102 (Andrews v. Riggs National Bank (In re Andrews)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.