Andrews v. Moore

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 2, 2006
• Docket: 05-7289
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 05-7289

ANTHONY ANDREWS,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

KIMBERLY A. MOORE; WINNIE JORDAN REAVES,

Defendants - Appellees,

and

JOHN ASHCROFT; FRANK D. WHITNEY; ROBERT BOBBY HIGDON, JR.; JOHN STUART BRUCE,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-04-174)

Submitted: January 18, 2006 Decided: March 2, 2006

Before LUTTIG, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony Andrews, Appellant Pro Se. Steve R. Matheny, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

- 2 - PER CURIAM:

Anthony Andrews appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed.

Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), action and his motions

for reconsideration pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e) and 60(b).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See

Andrews v. Moore, No. CA-04-174 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 27, 2005 & June 28,

2005). We deny the motions for abeyance and motion to recuse. We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 3 -