Andrews v. Meikel

Indiana Supreme Court

Andrews v. Meikel

69 Ind. 417

DecidedNovember 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 69 Ind. 417 (Andrews v. Meikel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. Meikel, 69 Ind. 417 (Ind. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Wrorden, J.

This was an action by the appellees, against the appellant, to recover for services rendered by the plaintiffs, as real estate brokers, for the defendant, at his instance and request, in the business of the sale and exchange of certain real estate.

Trial by jury, verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and judgment affirmed at general term.

There is no question presented by the record, save that as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

Having examined the evidence, we find, to say the least of it, that it tends to sustain the verdict.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Wrorden, J.

This was an action by the appellees, against the appellant, to recover for services rendered by the plaintiffs, as real estate brokers, for the defendant, at his instance and request, in the business of the sale and exchange of certain real estate.

Trial by jury, verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs, and judgment affirmed at general term.

There is no question presented by the record, save that as to the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the verdict.

Having examined the evidence, we find, to say the least of it, that it tends to sustain the verdict.

The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

69 Ind. 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-meikel-ind-1879.