Andrews v. Keeler

New York Supreme Court

Andrews v. Keeler

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 87

DecidedOctober 15, 1879

StatusPublished

This text of 26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 87 (Andrews v. Keeler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. Keeler, 26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 87 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Smith, J.;

Talcott, P. J., and Hakdin, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to" abide event, unless the plaintiff will stipulate that the [88]*88judgment be modified by striking out the sums allowed by the referee upon the two instruments dated January 7, 1869, and also by computing interest on the promissory note of April 17, 1867, at six per cent instead of seven per cent, and reducing the recovery thereon accordingly, and that in such case the judgment, as so modified, shall be affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party as against the other.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Smith, J.;

Talcott, P. J., and Hakdin, J., concurred.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered before another referee, costs to" abide event, unless the plaintiff will stipulate that the [88]*88judgment be modified by striking out the sums allowed by the referee upon the two instruments dated January 7, 1869, and also by computing interest on the promissory note of April 17, 1867, at six per cent instead of seven per cent, and reducing the recovery thereon accordingly, and that in such case the judgment, as so modified, shall be affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party as against the other.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 87, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-keeler-nysupct-1879.