Andrews v. Ives

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Andrews v. Ives

3 Conn. 368

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedJuly 15, 1820

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 3 Conn. 368 (Andrews v. Ives) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. Ives, 3 Conn. 368 (Colo. 1820).

Pincite

Opinion

Hosmer, Ch.J.

The plaintiff’s action is essentially on a special agreement, performed on his part; and so it appears from the declaration. The objection that it was nudum pac-not been supported. The maintenance of the defendant’s mother was on his request; and whether he was, or was not, obliged to support her, the loss sustained by the plaintiff, was a sufficient consideration. Mallory v. Lane, Cro. Jac. 342. Foster v. Scarlet, Cro. Eliz. 70. Preston v. Tooley, Cro. Eliz. 74. Rippon v. Norton, Cro. Eliz. 881. Webb’s case, 4 Leon. 110.

The other Judges were of the same opinion.

Judgment to be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hosmer, Ch.J.

The plaintiff’s action is essentially on a special agreement, performed on his part; and so it appears from the declaration. The objection that it was nudum pac-not been supported. The maintenance of the defendant’s mother was on his request; and whether he was, or was not, obliged to support her, the loss sustained by the plaintiff, was a sufficient consideration. Mallory v. Lane, Cro. Jac. 342. Foster v. Scarlet, Cro. Eliz. 70. Preston v. Tooley, Cro. Eliz. 74. Rippon v. Norton, Cro. Eliz. 881. Webb’s case, 4 Leon. 110.

The other Judges were of the same opinion.

Judgment to be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Conn. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-ives-conn-1820.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack