Andrews v. Heffernan

186 Misc. 1024, 63 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2464
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedAugust 12, 1946
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 186 Misc. 1024 (Andrews v. Heffernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Heffernan, 186 Misc. 1024, 63 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2464 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1946).

Opinion

Dickstein, J.

The Board of Elections rejected the designating petition of William T. Andrews for the position of Assemblyman of the Democratic Party from the 12th Assembly [1025]*1025District, New York County, on the purely technical ground that the petition as filed did not have a cover thereon setting forth a “ totalization ” of the pages and signatures as required by “ the time-honored practices of this Board ”. Nevertheless, the tabulation of signatures ordered by me showed a total of 1,416 valid signatures, whereas the total required was. only 350.

At hearings held before me the opponents of this candidate sought to introduce evidence that some of the signatures to this petition were not taken before the individual who acted as subscribing witness, although a comparison of the signatures of the individuals in question with the official pollbooks at the last election which contained the signatures of these persons showed them to be genuine in every respect. Furthermore, no attempt was made to produce before me any of the persons whose signatures were claimed to be fraudulent and I am satisfied that the nominating petition contains more than 350 genuine signatures.

Since the so-called “time-honored ” practice of the Board of Elections is merely a salutary custom but no definite statutory requirement and the proof before me showed overwhelmingly no evidence of any forgery or any other fraud, I conclude that the petition is valid.

Motion to validate the designation of William T. Andrews as a Democratic candidate for the office of Assemblyman from the 12th District of New York County is granted and the Board of Elections is hereby directed to print his name as such candidate on the forthcoming primary ballot.

Order signed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cole v. Winfield
201 Misc. 1049 (New York Supreme Court, 1952)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
186 Misc. 1024, 63 N.Y.S.2d 583, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-heffernan-nysupct-1946.