Andrews v. Gates

Fourth Circuit

Andrews v. Gates

587 F. App'x 75

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 12, 2014·No. No. 14-1763·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald W. Andrews, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging malicious prosecution, extortion, RICO violations and mail fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andrews v. Wolcott Rivers Gates, No. 3:14-cv-00076-HEH, 2014 WL 3016488 (E.D.Va. July 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald W. Andrews, Jr., appeals the district court’s order dismissing this action alleging malicious prosecution, extortion, RICO violations and mail fraud. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andrews v. Wolcott Rivers Gates, No. 3:14-cv-00076-HEH, 2014 WL 3016488 (E.D.Va. July 3, 2014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Andrews v. Gates, 587 F. App'x 75 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

587 F. App'x 75 (Andrews v. Gates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.