Andrews v. Downs

8 F.2d 1014, 56 App. D.C. 398, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3435
CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
DecidedDecember 7, 1925
DocketPatent Appeal No. 1749
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 8 F.2d 1014 (Andrews v. Downs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Downs, 8 F.2d 1014, 56 App. D.C. 398, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3435 (D.C. Cir. 1925).

Opinion

. ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the tribunals of the Patent Office in an interference proceeding in which priority of invention was awarded the senior party Downs.

We have examined the decisions of the Examiner of Interferences and the Board, which contain an exhaustive review of the facts, and agree with the Assistant Commissioner, from whose decision this appeal was taken, that the award to Downs was correct.

On the question whether Andrews was diligent, we attach much significance, as did the Patent Office, to the fact that the period of his delay came to an end only when he learned that Downs had given the invention to the public through the medium of various publications. The decision is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gordon Gould v. Arthur L. Schawlow and Charles H. Townes
363 F.2d 908 (Customs and Patent Appeals, 1966)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 F.2d 1014, 56 App. D.C. 398, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-downs-cadc-1925.