Andrews v. District Attorneys Office of Durham County

41 F. App'x 653
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 24, 2002·No. No. 02-1094·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Tyrone A. Andrews appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in his employment discrimination action and the magistrate judge’s order granting Defendant’s motion to strike Andrews’ amended complaint and denying Andrews’ motions to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge’s order, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Andrews v. Dist. Attorneys Office, No. CA-00-738-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2001; Jan. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Andrews v. District Attorneys Office of Durham County, 41 F. App'x 653 (4th Cir. 2002).

41 F. App'x 653 (Andrews v. District Attorneys Office of Durham County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.