Andrews v. District Attorneys Office of Durham County
This text of 41 F. App'x 653 (Andrews v. District Attorneys Office of Durham County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tyrone A. Andrews appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to Defendant in his employment discrimination action and the magistrate judge’s order granting Defendant’s motion to strike Andrews’ amended complaint and denying Andrews’ motions to compel discovery. We have reviewed the record, the magistrate judge’s order, and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Andrews v. Dist. Attorneys Office, No. CA-00-738-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 1, 2001; Jan. 11, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
41 F. App'x 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-district-attorneys-office-of-durham-county-ca4-2002.