Andrews v. Davis

Fourth Circuit

Andrews v. Davis

443 F. App'x 859

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedAugust 22, 2011

DocketNo. 11-1283

StatusPublished

This text of 443 F. App'x 859 (Andrews v. Davis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Andrews v. Davis, 443 F. App'x 859 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Andrews appeals the district court’s orders denying his various pretrial motions and a final order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andrews v. Davis, No. 5:09-cv-00297-BO (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2009; July 13, 2009); 2011 WL 195569 (Jan. 19, 2011); (Feb. 11, 2011; Feb. 23, 2011; March 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Tyrone Andrews appeals the district court’s orders denying his various pretrial motions and a final order denying relief on his employment discrimination complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Andrews v. Davis, No. 5:09-cv-00297-BO (E.D.N.C. July 9, 2009; July 13, 2009); 2011 WL 195569 (Jan. 19, 2011); (Feb. 11, 2011; Feb. 23, 2011; March 4, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

443 F. App'x 859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-davis-ca4-2011.