Andrews v. Cromer

255 S.E.2d 18, 243 Ga. 472, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 943
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedApril 5, 1979
Docket34451
StatusPublished

This text of 255 S.E.2d 18 (Andrews v. Cromer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Cromer, 255 S.E.2d 18, 243 Ga. 472, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 943 (Ga. 1979).

Opinion

Per curiam.

The appellant was held in contempt of court for failing to return the minor child of the parties to the appellee following her visitation with the child. She contends that there is no precedent for holding one in criminal contempt of court for retaining a child beyond the visitation period. We disagree. Fields v. Fields, 240 Ga. 173 (240 SE2d 58) (1977).

The trial court was also authorized to modify the visitation rights of appellant on its own motion in the contempt proceeding. Sampson v. Sampson, 240 Ga. 118 (239 SE2d 519) (1977); Kent v. Tankersley, 243 Ga. 471 (1979).

We find no abuse of discretion by the trial court in entering the contempt order.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fields v. Fields
240 S.E.2d 58 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Sampson v. Sampson
239 S.E.2d 519 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1977)
Kent v. Tankersley
254 S.E.2d 851 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
255 S.E.2d 18, 243 Ga. 472, 1979 Ga. LEXIS 943, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-cromer-ga-1979.