Andrews v. Concrete Placing Co.

183 So. 2d 685, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3729
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 9, 1966
DocketNo. 34798
StatusPublished

This text of 183 So. 2d 685 (Andrews v. Concrete Placing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Concrete Placing Co., 183 So. 2d 685, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3729 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition and cross-petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date 27 August 1965.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition and cross-petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition and cross-petition are therefore denied. • -

The request of petitioner for attorney’s fees is denied. The request of cross-respondent for attorney’s fees is granted and a fee of $100 is awarded.

THOMAS, Acting C. J., and ROBERTS, DREW, O’CONNELL and CALDWELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
183 So. 2d 685, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3729, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-concrete-placing-co-fla-1966.