Andrews v. City of Glendale

Missouri Court of Appeals

Andrews v. City of Glendale

297 S.W.3d 648, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1591, 2009 WL 3834114

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 17, 2009·No. ED 93219·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Andrews (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying benefits in connection with Claimant’s back condition. Claimant contends that the Commission erred by imposing a higher standard of proof than the law requires on the issue of causation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Andrews (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying benefits in connection with Claimant’s back condition. Claimant contends that the Commission erred by imposing a higher standard of proof than the law requires on the issue of causation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Andrews v. City of Glendale, 297 S.W.3d 648, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1591, 2009 WL 3834114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

297 S.W.3d 648 (Andrews v. City of Glendale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related