Andrews v. City of Glendale

297 S.W.3d 648, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1591, 2009 WL 3834114
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 17, 2009
DocketED 93219
StatusPublished

This text of 297 S.W.3d 648 (Andrews v. City of Glendale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. City of Glendale, 297 S.W.3d 648, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1591, 2009 WL 3834114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

James Andrews (Claimant) appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission denying benefits in connection with Claimant’s back condition. Claimant contends that the Commission erred by imposing a higher standard of proof than the law requires on the issue of causation.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

West v. DIRECTOR OF REVENUE, STATE
297 S.W.3d 648 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 S.W.3d 648, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1591, 2009 WL 3834114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-city-of-glendale-moctapp-2009.