Andrews v. City of Calais

196 F. App'x 3
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedSeptember 1, 2006
Docket06-1128
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 F. App'x 3 (Andrews v. City of Calais) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. City of Calais, 196 F. App'x 3 (1st Cir. 2006).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Ruby and Brian Andrews appeal the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants — the City of Calais, Maine, the Calais Police Department, and three individual police officers— in this action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiffs alleged that the defendant police officers used excessive force and lacked probable cause to arrest Brian Andrews for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated. They also attempted to assert theories of municipal liability. We have carefully reviewed the record and the parties’ submissions and, essentially for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge’s November 9, 2005, Recommended Decision, we affirm. See 1st Cir. R. 27(c).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commonwealth v. Faulcon
93 Va. Cir. 400 (Chesapeake County Circuit Court, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 F. App'x 3, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-city-of-calais-ca1-2006.