Andrews v. Bosworth
3 Mass. 223
Opinion
Sufficient cause to quash this writ appears on the face of the record certified to us ; and in such case the proper course is by motion
Writ of error quashed.
[When judgment is given against several, any of them may bring a writ of error, but it must be in the names of all, for otherwise this inconvenience would ensue, that every defendant might bring a writ of error, and, by that means, delay the plaintiff from having the benefit of his judgment, though it should be affirmed once or oftener.—Arcb. Prac Com. Pl. 1 vol. p. 208, 209.—Ed.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Andrews v. Bosworth, 3 Mass. 223 (Mass. 1807).
3 Mass. 223 (Andrews v. Bosworth) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commonwealth v. Walker
674 N.E.2d 249 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1997)
Boston Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. Wickham
254 Mass. 471 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1926)
McClure v. Taylor
38 Ind. 427 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1871)
Whitworth v. Carter
41 Miss. 639 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1868)
Crawford v. Crawford
44 N.H. 428 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1860)
Carey v. Rice
2 Ga. 408 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1847)
Gay v. Richardson
35 Mass. 417 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1836)
Whitmore v. Delano
6 N.H. 543 (Superior Court of New Hampshire, 1834)
Fotterall v. Floyd
6 Serg. & Rawle 315 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1820)