Andrews v. Barrett

California Court of Appeal

Andrews v. Barrett

281 P. 79, 100 Cal. App. 801, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 394

California Court of Appeal·Decided September 24, 1929·No. Docket No. 6624.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the municipal authorities to issue to the plaintiff a building permit. It was tried one week later than the action entitledAndrews v. City of Piedmont, ante, p. 700 [281 P. 78], this day filed. [1] While the actions were tried separately, the parties stipulated that the evidence in each case could be used in the other; that the reporters' transcripts could be included in one transcript; that the clerk's transcripts could be included in one transcript, and that all of the briefs could be considered in each case.

On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

This is an application for a writ of mandate to compel the municipal authorities to issue to the plaintiff a building permit. It was tried one week later than the action entitledAndrews v. City of Piedmont, ante, p. 700 [281 P. 78], this day filed. [1] While the actions were tried separately, the parties stipulated that the evidence in each case could be used in the other; that the reporters' transcripts could be included in one transcript; that the clerk's transcripts could be included in one transcript, and that all of the briefs could be considered in each case.

On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont, supra, the judgment is affirmed.

Nourse, J., and Koford, P.J., concurred.

Andrews v. Barrett, 281 P. 79, 100 Cal. App. 801, 1929 Cal. App. LEXIS 394 (Cal. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

281 P. 79 (Andrews v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related