Andrews v. Barrett
This text of 100 Cal. App. 801 (Andrews v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an application for a .writ of mandate to compel the municipal authorities to issue to the plaintiff a building permit. It was tried one week later than- the action entitled Andrews v. City of Piedmont, ante, p. 700 [281 Pac. 78], this day filed. While the actions were tried separately, the parties stipulated that the evidence in. each case could be used in the other; that the reporters’ transcripts could be included in one transcript; that the clerk's transcripts could be included in one transcript, and that all of the briefs could be considered in each case.
On the authority of Andrews v. City of Piedmont, supra, the judgment is affirmed.
Nourse, J., and Koford, P. J., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
100 Cal. App. 801, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-barrett-calctapp-1929.