Andrews v. Atkins

100 F.R.D. 762, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20107
CourtDistrict Court, D. Kansas
DecidedJanuary 25, 1984
DocketNo. 80-3106
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 100 F.R.D. 762 (Andrews v. Atkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Kansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Atkins, 100 F.R.D. 762, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20107 (D. Kan. 1984).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SAFFELS, District Judge.

On January 20, 1984, the clerk of this court received a letter from plaintiff which the court has treated as a motion to obtain attendance of witnesses at trial. The trial in this matter is scheduled for February 13, 1984. In plaintiff’s letter he does nothing more than request twenty (20) summons forms, which he evidently intends to complete and have served by the United States Marshal so that he might call “approximately 20 witnesses” to appear at trial.

In the pretrial order entered in this action on May 5, 1983, plaintiff was ordered to “prepare, file and serve fifteen days pri- or to trial” a summary of the anticipated testimony of the witnesses and other evidence he plans to offer at trial. Defendants filed their list of witnesses and exhibits on February 9, 1983. Plaintiff was served with a copy of this list. Plaintiff was further informed in the aforementioned pretrial order that witnesses and exhibits listed by one party may be called or offered by the other party, and that witnesses and exhibits not exchanged and filed as required by that order “shall not be permitted to testify or be received in evidence, respectively, except by agreement of counsel or upon order of the court or in proper rebuttal.” Despite these forewarnings, it now appears plaintiff has made no pre-arrangements for the presentation of his evidence at trial.

At the trial of a lawsuit, it is the plaintiff’s responsibility to be prepared to introduce evidence to prove each of the alleged facts that support the claims raised in the lawsuit. In general, there are two kinds of [763]*763trial evidence: (1) exhibits and (2) testimony of witnesses. It is the plaintiffs responsibility to produce all of the evidence to prove his or her case, whether that evidence is in the form of exhibits or witness testimony. If the plaintiff wants to call witnesses to testify, he must follow certain procedures to ensure that the witnesses will be at the trial and available to testify. The plaintiff must follow these procedures when the potential witness is a defendant to be called to testify by a plaintiff, or a person not a party to the lawsuit to be called to testify by a plaintiff (“party” meaning either a plaintiff or defendant).

There are different procedures to be followed to secure the testimony of witnesses in different circumstances. A description of those procedures is set forth herein which is substantially borrowed from a Memorandum entitled PROCEDURE FOR CALLING WITNESSES TO TRIAL developed and distributed by the United States District Court for the District of Wisconsin.

I. PROCEDURES FOR OBTAINING ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED WITNESSES WHO AGREE TO TESTIFY VOLUNTARILY

An incarcerated witness who agrees voluntarily to attend trial to give testimony cannot come to court unless this court orders the warden or other custodian to permit the witness to be transported to court. This court will not issue such an order unless it is satisfied:

(a) that the prospective witness is willing to attend and
(b) that the prospective witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

The willingness of the prospective witness can be shown in one of two ways:

(a) The party himself or herself can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has informed the party that he or she is willing to testify voluntarily; that is, without being subpoenaed and without receiving a witness fee. The party must state in the affidavit when and where the prospective witness informed the party of this willingness.
OR
(b) The party can serve and file an affidavit sworn to by the prospective witness, in which the witness states that he or she is willing to testify without being subpoenaed and without receiving a witness fee.

The prospective witness’ actual knowledge of relevant facts can be shown in one of two ways:

(a) The party himself or herself can swear by affidavit that the prospective witness has actual knowledge and summarize what that knowledge is. However, this can be done only if the party has actual first-hand knowledge that the prospective witness was an eye-witness or an ear-witness to the relevant facts. For example, if an incident occurred in the plaintiff’s cell and, at the time, the plaintiff saw that a cellmate was present and observed the incident, the plaintiff may swear to the cellmate’s ability to testify.

OR

(b) The party can serve and file an affidavit sworn to by the prospective witness in which the witness describes the relevant facts to which the prospective witness was an eye-witness or an ear-witness. Whether the affidavit is made by the plaintiff or by the prospective witness, it must be specific about what the incident was, when and where it occurred, who was present, and how the prospective witness happened to be in a position to see or to hear what occurred at the time it occurred.

In sufficient time so that the matter may be concluded prior to trial, a party intending to introduce the testimony of incarcerated witnesses who have agreed voluntarily to attend the trial must serve and file a written motion asking for a court order [764]*764requiring that'such witnesses be brought to court at the time of trial. The motion must:

(a) state the name and address of each such witness; and
(b) be accompanied by the necessary affidavits showing that each witness is willing to testify and that each witness has actual knowledge of relevant facts.

The court will review and rule on the motion, specifying which prospective witnesses must be brought to court. The court has the authority to deny the presence of witnesses who will be giving irrelevant or repetitive testimony or who are threats to security. Subsequently, the court will issue the order necessary to cause the witness’ custodian to bring the witness to court.

II. PROCEDURE FOR OBTAINING THE ATTENDANCE OF INCARCERATED WITNESSES WHO REFUSE TO TESTIFY VOLUNTARILY.

If an incarcerated witness refuses voluntarily to attend trial, TWO separate procedures must be followed:

A. The witness must be subpoenaed. The party seeking the witness’ testimony must provide to the clerk of the court sufficient information on each witness so that subpoena forms may be completed for each witness who has refused voluntarily to testify at trial. With the information for the forms, the party must send a money order made payable to each witness for the daily witness fee of Thirty Dollars ($30). This must be accomplished a sufficient amount of time prior to trial so that service may be concluded. These items should be attached to the motion required under B below.
[Please note that no statute authorizes the use of public funds in civil cases for paying the $30 per day witness fee. See Johnson v. Hubbard, 698 F.2d 286, 289-90 (6th Cir.1983); Hudson v. Ingalls Shipbuilding, 516 F.Supp. 708 (S.D.Ala.1981). The payment of such fees is required of the party seeking that witness’ testimony, even if the party has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States Marshals Service v. Means
741 F.2d 1053 (Eighth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
100 F.R.D. 762, 1984 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-atkins-ksd-1984.