Andrews v. Andrews

169 So. 122, 1936 La. App. LEXIS 318
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedJune 26, 1936
DocketNo. 5261.
StatusPublished

This text of 169 So. 122 (Andrews v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Andrews, 169 So. 122, 1936 La. App. LEXIS 318 (La. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

TALIAFERRO, Judge.

The appeal herein was perfected by defendants, Mrs. Addie McDuff Andrews and J. T. Raney, from a judgment of the lower court, adverse to their contentions.

Prior to submission of the case in this court, appellants’ counsel filed a written motion praying that the appeal be dismissed. A copy of this motion was served upon counsel for appellee prior to the case being submitted here and, otherwise, we know that these counsel are cognizant of appellants’ desire to have their appeal dismissed. They have made'no opposition thereto and, ijr this reason, we assume they concur in the motion.

It is now ordered that the appeal be and it is hereby dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 So. 122, 1936 La. App. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-andrews-lactapp-1936.