Andrews v. Andrews
This text of 149 S.E. 870 (Andrews v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The exception is to a judgment adjudging the respondent in contempt of court for failure to p&y temporary alimony and deliver a certain chattel as required by the court’s order. No reason was offered for failure to deliver the chattel, but it was insisted that the failure to pay the amount of money was due to financial inability. It appeared that the respondent had earned more than sufficient to make the monthly payments as required by the order of the court, but had never paid any part of the alimony. The .respondent testified that all of his earnings were expended for the necessary expenses of individual living, and that he was without means to make the payments. It was a matter of opinion whether the respondent could have sustained himself on less than his entire earnings, and whether he could not earn more, concerning which the judge was authorized to find adversely to the respondent. In this view, and in view of the failure to deliver the chattel or explain such failure, the judge was authorized to find that [98]*98no bona fide attempt had been made to comply with the order of the court, and to adjudge the respondent in contempt.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
149 S.E. 870, 169 Ga. 97, 1929 Ga. LEXIS 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-andrews-ga-1929.