Andrews v. Andrews
This text of 356 So. 2d 1333 (Andrews v. Andrews) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The trial court erred in awarding lump sum alimony to the wife where such alimony was not asked for in the wife’s complaint and the record is devoid of evidence establishing her need. Calligarich v. Calligarich, 256 So.2d 60 (Fla. 4th DCA 1971); Cann v. Cann, 334 So.2d 325 (Fla. 1st DCA 1976). Therefore, upon motion of either party, the trial court shall conduct an evi-dentiary hearing regarding the property rights of the parties as well as any award of alimony. See Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.190(b).
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
356 So. 2d 1333, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-andrews-fladistctapp-1978.