Andrews v. Allen

4 Del. 452
CourtSuperior Court of Delaware
DecidedJuly 1, 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 4 Del. 452 (Andrews v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews v. Allen, 4 Del. 452 (Del. Ct. App. 1847).

Opinion

The Court

refused the motion: 1st. An agent contracting personally, is personally liable, though his agency be known, and the principal be disclosed. (2 Kent’s Com. 630; 1 Saund. Pl. & Ev. 82, 72.)

2d. If this be a joint contract, it is not a ground for a non-suit. That must be pleaded in abatement. It is no less the contract of W. D. Andrews because it is also the contract of N. Andrews. And if a defendant would object, that not only he, [454]*454but others, made the contract, he must plead it. Not so of a plaintiff. He knows with whom the contract was made.

Houston, for plaintiff. Layton, for defendant.

3d. The third ground depends on evidence yet to be produced by the defendant, and cannot be any reason for a nonsuit.

Verdict for plaintiff.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 Del. 452, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-v-allen-delsuperct-1847.