Andrews Taxi & U-Drive-It Co. v. Summerour

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Andrews Taxi & U-Drive-It Co. v. Summerour

106 S.E.2d 63, 98 Ga. App. 425, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 599

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided October 6, 1958·No. 37325, 37326·Published

Opinion

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

1. We have set out the evidence somewhat in detail. It is entirely sufficient to sustain the verdict as to the general grounds.

2. Counsel for the defendant has apparently made no effort to comply with the rales regarding appeal oni special grounds. None of the special grounds as shown are sufficient, of themselves, to- be the basis for a decision thereon by this court.

3. Since we are affirming the case on the general grounds on the main bill, the, cross-bill is dismissed.

Judgment affirmed on main bill. Cross-bill dismissed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner, Presiding Judge.

1. We have set out the evidence somewhat in detail. It is entirely sufficient to sustain the verdict as to the general grounds.

2. Counsel for the defendant has apparently made no effort to comply with the rales regarding appeal oni special grounds. None of the special grounds as shown are sufficient, of themselves, to- be the basis for a decision thereon by this court.

3. Since we are affirming the case on the general grounds on the main bill, the, cross-bill is dismissed.

Judgment affirmed on main bill. Cross-bill dismissed.

Townsend and Carlisle, JJ., concur.

Andrews Taxi & U-Drive-It Co. v. Summerour, 106 S.E.2d 63, 98 Ga. App. 425, 1958 Ga. App. LEXIS 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

106 S.E.2d 63 (Andrews Taxi & U-Drive-It Co. v. Summerour) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.