Andrews Acheampong v. Bank of New York Mellon

531 F. App'x 751
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 26, 2013
Docket13-1145
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 531 F. App'x 751 (Andrews Acheampong v. Bank of New York Mellon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Andrews Acheampong v. Bank of New York Mellon, 531 F. App'x 751 (6th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After plaintiff Andrews Acheampong defaulted on his mortgage payments, defendant Bank of New York Mellon (“BNYM”), which held an interest in the mortgage, foreclosed on plaintiffs property. Plaintiff brought this action in Michigan state court to invalidate the foreclosure, and defendants removed the case to federal district court. Plaintiff alleged that BNYM lacked standing to foreclose under Michigan law, and that BNYM fraudulently acquired its mortgage interest. Plaintiff also alleged that defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“BANA”), which owned the note secured by the mortgage, denied him a loan modification in violation of Michigan law, and that BANA breached the terms of a trial modification plan it negotiated with plaintiff. Defendants moved to dismiss plaintiffs claims, and the district court granted the motion in a written opinion. Plaintiff timely appealed.

Having thoroughly reviewed the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, we find no error in the district court’s analysis. The reasoning supporting the judgment for defendants was clearly and persuasively articulated by the district court, and accordingly there is no need for a detailed written opinion by this court. Any opinion by us would be duplicative and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. We therefore affirm the district court’s judgment for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Patrick Rugiero v. Nationstar Mtg LLC
580 F. App'x 376 (Sixth Circuit, 2014)
Acheampong v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon
134 S. Ct. 2297 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
531 F. App'x 751, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/andrews-acheampong-v-bank-of-new-york-mellon-ca6-2013.